







|

Junk
E-mail Decisions and Litigation |
|
Parker v. C.N. Enterprises
Press Release - 9/18/97
Austin, Texas, September 18, 1997: A Texas Court
has entered a temporary injunction against a California resident and his company,
prohibiting further spamming of the Internet without consent. Several Internet leaders in
Austin filed the lawsuit earlier this year, claiming that Craig Nowak and his company,
C.N. Enterprises, had illegally used the return address of an Austin business when he sent
out a mass commercial solicitation by Internet electronic mail.
The lawsuit was filed by Tracy LaQuey Parker, a leading Internet author, who owned the
rights to the domain name flowers.com used by Nowak and his company. Mr. Nowak's
unsolicited mass mailing, known as a spam, offered for sale information on ``Free Cash
Grants'' for $19.95. Mr. Nowak's spam used Ms. Parker's domain name in the electronic
return address, which allowed Mr. Nowak to avoid receiving thousands of return-to-sender
messages and the inevitable hate mail from recipients who despise the controversial
practice of spam. Ms. Parker received thousands of such messages, preventing her from
accessing her Internet account for hours and temporarily shutting down her Internet
service provider's mail servers. In essence, the lawsuit claims, Mr. Nowak used Ms.
Parker's mailbox as his personal trash bin.
Spamming is being criticized at all levels of the industry. Upon hearing of the lawsuit,
Vint Cerf, Senior Vice President for MCI Telecommunications, also known as ``the father of
the Internet,'' said,
``Spamming is the scourge of electronic mail and
newsgroups on the Internet. It can seriously interfere with the operation of public
services, to say nothing of the effect it may have on any individual's email system.
Spammers are, in effect, taking resources away from users and service suppliers without
compensation and without authorization. MCI was the first in the industry to publicly
announce its policy against spamming and will be watching the decision in this case with
great interest.''
The court order, entered last Wednesday, September 17, by Travis County District Judge
Scott McCown, prohibits Nowak, his company, and those ``acting in concert'' with him, from
using Ms. Parker's domain name in any electronic mailings, or from using any Internet
domain name as a return address without the owner's permission. Judge McCown also ordered
Mr. Nowak to respond to discovery requests served upon him, and set the case for trial on
November 10, 1997.
Joining Ms. Parker in the lawsuit are her business partners, Peter Rauch, and her husband
Patrick Parker, who also used the domain name. Also suing Nowak is Ms. Parker's Internet
service provider at the time, Zilker Internet Park, which had to deal with the
consequences of the flood of returned junk mail messages. They are joined by two Internet
interest groups, the Texas
Internet Service Providers Association and EFF-Austin. Both groups fear the damage done to
the Internet by mass mailings of the sort at issue in this lawsuit.
Ms. Parker said she was pleased with the court's ruling. ``Judge McCown seemed to quickly
understand the harm that this type of irresponsible use of the Internet can cause people
like me and small businesses like Zilker,'' she said. ``We hope that this ruling sends a
message not just to the defendants but to everyone who is abusing the Internet this way.''
Pete Kennedy, the
lawyer who is representing Ms. Parker and the others, commented that ``While Internet
service providers are trying to combat spam with technical means, there is also a need to
set a clear legal precedent that people do not have the right to send Internet junk mail
and use other people's e-mail accounts as their personal junkyard.''

|
|