Title W.JPG (8195 bytes)
LegalResourcesB.JPG (3803 bytes)
DecisionsB.JPG (4342 bytes)
JunkB.JPG (3625 bytes)
IntellectualPropB.JPG (4195 bytes)
PolicyB.JPG (4454 bytes)
AOL InfoW.JPG (4002 bytes)
FeedbackB.JPG (3418 bytes)
 

AOL InfoHead.JPG (13490 bytes)

AOL Policies

McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission Opinion
(Concurrence, Justice Ginsburg)

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

McINTYRE, executor of ESTATE OF McINTYRE, DECEASED,

v.

OHIO ELECTIONS OF COMMISSION

Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Ohio

No. 93-986.   Argued October 12, 1994--Decided April 19, 1995

Justice Ginsburg, concurring.

The dissent is stirring in its appreciation of democratic values.  But I do not see the Court's opinion as unguided by "bedrock principle," tradition, or our case law.  See post, at 375-378, 378-380. Margaret McIntyre's case, it seems to me, bears a marked resemblance to Margaret Gilleo's case [n.1] and Mary Grace's. [n.2] All three decisions, I believe, are sound, and hardly sensational, applications of our First Amendment jurisprudence.

In for a calf is not always in for a cow. The Court's decision finds unnecessary, overintrusive, and inconsistent with American ideals the State's imposition of a fine on an individual leafleteer who, within her local community, spoke her mind, but sometimes not her name. We do not thereby hold that the State may not in other, larger circumstances, require the speaker to disclose its interest by disclosing its identity. Appropriately leaving open matters not presented by McIntyre's handbills, the Court recognizes that a State's interest in protecting an election process "might justify a more limited identification requirement." Ante, at 19. But the Court has convincingly explained why Ohio lacks "cause for inhibiting the leafletting at issue here." Ibid. 


Notes

1 See City of Ladue v. Gilleo, 512 U.S. 43 (1994), in which we held that the City of Ladue could not prohibit homeowner Gilleo's display of a small sign, on her lawn or in a window, opposing war in the Persian Gulf.

2 Grace was the "lone picketer" who stood on the sidewalk in front of this Court with a sign containing the text of the First Amendment, prompting us to exclude public sidewalks from the statutory ban on display of a "flag, banner, or device" on Court grounds. United States v. Grace, 461 U.S. 171, 183 (1983).

top.gif (599 bytes)


Policies|Profile|Documents & Filings|Annual Reports
Press Releases|AOL.COM

  Home|Feedback|Disclaimer

 

**This site is designed to work best with Microsoft Internet Explorer 5 or Netscape 4.0 or higher.  Other browsers may produce varied results.**

 

Copyright © 2003 America Online, Inc. All rights reserved.